Investigation of Febrile Neutropenic Cases and Risk Factors
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
RESEARCH ARTICLE
P: 3-3
January 2013

Investigation of Febrile Neutropenic Cases and Risk Factors

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2013;2(2):3-3
1. Fırat Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Elazığ, Türkiye
2. Özel Damla Hastanesi, Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Kliniği, Elazığ, Türkiye
3. İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Onkoloji Anabilim Dalı, Malatya, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Summary

Introduction: Febrile neutropenia is one of the most important factors responsible for morbidity and mortality in cancer patients.
Materials and Methods: In this study, febrile neutropenic attacks seen in 100 patients who were consulted between January 2008 and December 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Only the first attack of each patient was included in the study.
Results: Fifty-eight of the patients were female and 42 were male. Mean age of the patients was 59.4 ± 13.4 years. Primary malignancies were hematologic malignancy in 30 patients and solid tumors in 70 patients. According to the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer criteria, 29 of the patients were in the low-risk group, whereas 71 patients were in the high-risk group. Mean absolute neutrophil count, mean duration of the neutropenic period and mean duration of hospitalization were 247.8 ± 25.2/mm3, 3.3 ± 1.9 days and 4.4 ± 0.7 days, respectively. Of the 100 neutropenic attacks, 22 were clinically defined infection, 39 were microbiologically defined infection and 39 were fever of unknown origin. The most frequent infection sites were pneumonia and pyelonephritis based on the clinical and microbiological findings. Isolated strains included 44 gram-negative bacilli, four gram-positive cocci and nine Candida spp. Escherichia coli was the most frequently isolated agent in these strains. Empirical treatment of patients included monotherapy (61%) and combined therapy (39%). The most frequently used antimicrobial agents in monotherapy were cefoperazone-sulbactam. Mean fever defervescence time after initiation of empirical treatment was 2.6 ± 0.2 days. Fifteen of the patients died during the febrile neutropenia attack.
Conclusion: Clinical and microbiological approaches should be made carefully in order to determine the focus of infection in patients with febrile neutropenia. Early initiation of empiric antimicrobial treatment seems to be important in reducing mortality.

Keywords:
Febrile neutropenia, cancer, risk factors

References

1
Akova M, Akalın HE. Nötropenik hastalarda ateş. Hacettepe Tıp Dergisi 1988; 21: 71-87.
2
Akova M. Kanserli nötropenik hastaya yaklaşım. Hacettepe Tıp Dergisi 1995; 26: 31-6.
3
Pizzo PA. Fever in immunosuppressed patients. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 893-900.
4
Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young JA, Wingard JR. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52: 56-93.
5
Innes H, Lim SL, Hall A, Chan SY, Bhalla N, Marshall E. Management of febrile neutropenia in solid tumours and lymphomas using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index: feasibility and safety in routine clinical practice. Support Care Cancer 2008; 16: 485-91.
6
Paesmans M. Risk factors assessment in febrile neutropenia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 16: 107-11.
7
Viscoli C, Bruzzi P, Castagnola E, Boni L, Calandra T, Gaya H, Meunier F, Feld R, Zinner S. Factors associated with bacteremia in febrile, granulocytopenic cancer patients. The International Antimicrobial Therapy Cooperative Group (IATCG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 430-7.
8
Kern WV. Risk assessment and risk-based therapeutic strategies in febrile neutropenia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2001; 14: 415-22.
9
Viscoli C, Castagnola E. Treatment of febrile neutropenia: What is new? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2002; 15: 377-82.
10
Pizzo PA. Management of fever in patients with cancer and treatment induced neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1323-32.
11
Klastersky J. Therapy of infections in cancer patients. In: Klastersky J, Schimpff SC, Senn HJ (eds). Handbook of Supportive Care in Cancer. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1995: 1-44.
12
Kandemir Ö, Şahin E, Tiftik N, Kaya A. Febril nötropenik kanser hastalarında gözlenen infeksiyonlar ve tedavi başarısını etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi. ANKEM 2006; 20: 98-102.
13
Öztürk R. Febril nötropenide yeni etkenler ve antimikrobiklere karşı direnç. 3. Febril Nötropeni Mezuniyet Sonrası Eğitim Kursu Özet Kitabı. Ankara, 2004: 15-25.
14
Wislinghoff H, Seifert H, Wenzel P, Edmond MB. Current trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies and solid neoplasms in hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1103-10.
15
Akova M. Febril nötropenik hastalarda infeksiyon etkeni olarak gram-negatif bakterilerin dönüşü. 4. Febril Nötropeni Simpozyumu Program ve Özet Kitabı. Özet no. O-13. Antalya, 2001.
16
Gaytan-Martinez J, Mateos-Garcia E, Sanchez-Cortes E, Gonzalez-Llaven J, Casanova-Cardiel LJ, Fuentes-Allen JL. Microbiological findings in febrile neutropenia. Arch Med Res 2000; 31: 388-92.
17
Erman M, Akova M, Akan H, Korten V, Ferhanoğlu B, Köksal I, Cetinkaya Y, Uzun O, Unal S; Febrile Neutropenia Study Group of Turkey. Comparison of cefepime and ceftazidime in combination with amikacin in the empirical treatment of high-risk patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Scand J Infect Dis 2001; 33: 827-31.
18
Demiraslan H, Yıldız O, Kaynar L, Altuntaş F, Eser B, Aygen B. Febril nötropenik hastalardan izole edilen mikroorganizmalar ve antimikrobiyal duyarlılıkları: 2005 yılı verileri. Erciyes Tıp Dergisi 2007; 29: 376-80.
19
Swati M, Gita N, Sujata B, Farah J, Preeti M. Microbial etiology of febrile neutropenia. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2010; 26: 49-55.
20
Vento S, Cainelli F. Infections in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: etiology, prevention, and treatment. Lancet Oncol 2003; 4: 595-604.
21
Paul M, Soares-Weiser K, Grozinsky S, Leibovici L. Betalactam versus beta-lactam-aminoglycoside combination therapy in cancer patients with neutropaenia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 3: CD003038.
22
Paul M, Borok S, Fraser A, Vidal L, Leibovici L. Empirical antibiotics against gram-positive infections for febrile neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 55: 436-44.
23
Lindblad R, Rodjer S, Adriansson M, Andreasson B, Backstrom B, Johansson P, Karlsson K, Rhedin C, Turesson I. Empiric monotherapy for febrile neutropenia. A randomized study comparing meropenem with ceftazidime. Scand J Infect Dis 1998; 30: 237-43.
24
Ozyilkan O, Yalcintas U, Baskan S. Imipenem-cilastatin versus sulbactam-cefoperazone plus amikacin in the initial treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Korean J Intern Med 1999; 14: 15-9.
25
Paul M, Soares-Weiser S, Leibovici L. Beta-lactam monotherapy versus beta-lactam aminoglycoside combination therapy for fever with neutropenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1111-9.
26
Ferrara JJ, MacDougall C, Gallagher JC. Empiric antifungal therapy in patients with febrile neutropenia. Pharmacotherapy 2011; 31: 369-85.