Metisilin Duyarlı ve Metisilin Dirençli Staphylococcus aureus İzolatlarında Antimikrobiyal Direnç ve Biofilm Üretimi Arasındaki İlişkinin In vitro Değerlendirilmesi
PDF

ÖZGÜN MAKALE

Metisilin Duyarlı ve Metisilin Dirençli Staphylococcus aureus İzolatlarında Antimikrobiyal Direnç ve Biofilm Üretimi Arasındaki İlişkinin In vitro Değerlendirilmesi

Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2022;11:14-14 DOI: 10.4274/mjima.galenos.2022.2021.14
, , , , ,
PDF
İzin

Öz

Giriş: Staphylococcus aureus infeksiyonlarının patogenezinde biofilm oluşturma yeteneklerinin önemli rolü vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı metisilin duyarlı Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) ve metisilin dirençli Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) izolatlarının biofilm oluşturma kapasitelerinin araştırılması ve antimicrobial direnç profilleri ile ilişkilerinin değerlendirilmesidir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 50 MRSA ve 50 MSSA izolatı dahil edildi. İzolatların antimikrobiyal duyarlılıkları disk difüzyon yöntemi ile test edildi. İzolatların vankomisin ve teikoplanin için minimum inhibitör konsantrasyonları (MİK) sıvı mikrodilüsyon yöntemiyle biofilm oluşturma kapasiteleri Kongo Red Agar besiyeri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. icaA, icaD, IS256 and eno gen varlığı polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu yöntemi ile araştırıldı.

Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen tüm MRSA ve MSSA izolatları vankomisin, teikoplanin, kloramfenikol ve linezolide duyarlı bulundu. İki MRSA ve 2 MSSA izolatının heterojen vankomisin orta dirençli S. aureus (hVISA) olduğu belirlendi. Biofilm oluşturma kapasiteleri bakımından MRSA ve MSSA izolatları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı. MSSA ve MRSA izolatlarının tamamında, eno ve icaD genlerinin varlığı saptandı. icaA geni ise tüm MRSA ve 49 MSSA izolatlarında gözlendi. IS256 geni 50 MRSA izolatının 35’inde saptanırken, MSSA izolatlarının hiçbirinde IS256 geni varlığı tespit edilmedi. IS256 pozitif MRSA izolatlarında IS256 negatif MRSA izolatlarına göre; amikasin, gentamisin, siprofloksasin, levofloksasin, rifampin, klindamisin ve tetrasiklin direnç oranları anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu. Benzer şekilde vankomisin ve teikoplanin ortalama MİK değerleri IS256 pozitif MRSA izolatlarında IS256 negatif MRSA izolatlarına göre anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğu gözlendi.

Sonuç: Bu çalışma IS256 gen varlığının antimikrobiyal dirençle özellikle de metisilin direnci ile ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Metisilin dirençli Staphylococcus aureus, metisilin duyarlı Staphylococcus aureus, antimikrobiyal duyarlılık, biofilm oluşumu

Kaynakça

1

Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Shortridge D, Zervos M, Jones RN. Twenty-year trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities among Staphylococcus aureus from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(Suppl 1):S47-S53.

2

Tenover FC, Biddle JW, Lancaster MV. Increasing resistance to vancomycin and other glycopeptides in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:327-32.

3

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Basel, 2019.

4

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. twenty-seventh informational supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Perform Stand. Antimicrob. susceptibility testing. 27th ed. CLSI Suppl. M100-S27. Wayne PA: Clin Lab Stand Inst, 2017.

5

Shariati A, Dadashi M, Moghadam MT, van Belkum A, Yaslianifard S, Darban-Sarokhalil D. Global prevalence and distribution of vancomycin resistant, vancomycin intermediate and heterogeneously vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12689

6

Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence 2011;2:445-59.

7

Carneiro CR, Postol E, Nomizo R, Reis LF, Brentani RR. Identification of enolase as a laminin-binding protein on the surface of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbes Infect. 2004;6:604-8.

8

Maki H, Murakami K. Formation of potent promoters of the mutant llm gene by IS256 transposition in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6944-8.

9

Kiem S, Oh WS, Peck KR, Lee NY, Lee JY, Song JH, Hwang ES, Kim EC, Cha CY, Choe KW. Phase variation of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus by IS256 insertion and its impact on the capacity adhering to polyurethane surface. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:779-82.

10

Craft KM, Nguyen JM, Berg LJ, Townsend SD. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): antibiotic-resistance and the biofilm phenotype. Medchemcomm. 2019;10:1231-41.

11

Wootton M, Howe RA, Hillman R, Walsh TR, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP. A modified population analysis profile (PAP) method to detect hetero-resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus in a UK hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47:399-403.

12

Freeman D, Falkiner F, Keane C. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:872-4.

13

Różańska A, Chmielarczyk A, Romaniszyn D, Bulanda M, Walkowicz M, Osuch P, Knych T. Antibiotic resistance, ability to form biofilm and susceptibility to copper alloys of selected staphylococcal strains isolated from touch surfaces in Polish hospital wards. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:80.

14

Vancraeynest D, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F. Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet Microbiol. 2004;103:241-7.

15

Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Pirini V, Ravaioli S, Otto M, Arciola CR. Antibiotic multiresistance strictly associated with IS256 and ica genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from implant orthopedic infections. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;83:813-8.

16

Vasudevan P, Nair MK, Annamalai T, Venkitanarayanan KS. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol. 2003;92:179-85.

17

Akpaka PE, Roberts R, Monecke S. Molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance genes against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Trinidad and Tobago. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10:316-23.

18

Horváth A, Dobay O, Sahin-Tóth J, Juhász E, Pongrácz J, Iván M, Fazakas E, Kristóf K. Characterisation of antibiotic resistance, virulence, clonality and mortality in MRSA and MSSA bloodstream infections at a tertiary-level hospital in Hungary: a 6-year retrospective study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2020;19:17

19

Pignataro D, Foglia F, Della Rocca MT, Melardo C, Santella B, Folliero V, Shinde S, Pafundi PC, Sasso FC, Iovene MR, Galdiero M, Boccia G, Franci G, Finamore E, Galdiero M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility experiences from the University Hospital ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’ of Naples. Pathog Glob Health. 2020;114:451-6.

20

Wootton M, MacGowan AP, Walsh TR, Howe RA. A multicenter study evaluating the current strategies for isolating Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:329-32.

21

Hu J, Ma XX, Tian Y, Pang L, Cui LZ, Shang H. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility found in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Northeast China. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73300.

22

Batista IR, Prates ACL, Santos BS, Araújo JCC, Bonfim YCO, Pimenta Rodrigues MV, Morceli G, Polettini J, Cavalleri AC, Winkelstroter LK, Pereira VC. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm production in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from white coats of health university students. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18:37.

23

Piechota M, Kot B, Frankowska-Maciejewska A, Grużewska A, Woźniak-Kosek A. Biofilm formation by methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains from hospitalized patients in Poland. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:4657396.

24

Smith K, Perez A, Ramage G, Lappin D, Gemmell CG, Lang. Biofilm formation by Scottish clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:1018-23.

25

Belbase A, Pant ND, Nepal K, Neupane B, Baidhya R, Baidya R, Lekhak B. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm production among the strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus/wound swab samples in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16:15.

26

Gerke C, Kraft A, Süssmuth R, Schweitzer O, Götz F. Characterization of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity involved in the biosynthesis of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. J Biol Chem. 1998;17:273:18586-93.

27

Beloin C, Michaelis K, Lindner K, Landini P, Hacker J, Ghigo JM, Dobrindt. The transcriptional antiterminator RfaH represses biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:1316-31.

28

Kwon AS, Park GC, Ryu SY, Lim DH, Lim DY, Choi CH, Park Y, Lim Y. Higher biofilm formation in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J of Antimicrob Agent. 2008;32:68-72.

29

Lyon BR, Gillespie MT, Skurray RA. Detection and characterization of IS256, an insertion sequence in Staphylococcus aureus. J Gen Microbiol. 1987;133:3031-8.

30

Maki H, McCallum N, Bischoff M, Wada A, Berger-Bächi B. tca A inactivation increases glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agent Chemother. 2004;48:1953-9.